<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guitar Magazines, Do You Still Read Them?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonshadrick.com/music-business/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonshadrick.com/music-business/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/</link>
	<description>music.guitars.life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 03:33:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonshadrick.com/music-business/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonshadrick.com/2009/05/21/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/#comment-292</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only read about 4 or so guitar magazines in my entire life. I find after reading any magazine I completely forget about it. I don&#039;t ever use them for reference</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve only read about 4 or so guitar magazines in my entire life. I find after reading any magazine I completely forget about it. I don&#39;t ever use them for reference</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonshadrick.com/music-business/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonshadrick.com/2009/05/21/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/#comment-192</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only read about 4 or so guitar magazines in my entire life. I find after reading any magazine I completely forget about it. I don&#039;t ever use them for reference</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve only read about 4 or so guitar magazines in my entire life. I find after reading any magazine I completely forget about it. I don&#39;t ever use them for reference</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonshadrick.com/music-business/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/comment-page-1/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonshadrick.com/2009/05/21/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/#comment-177</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only read about 4 or so guitar magazines in my entire life. I find after reading any magazine I completely forget about it. I don&#039;t ever use them for reference</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve only read about 4 or so guitar magazines in my entire life. I find after reading any magazine I completely forget about it. I don&#39;t ever use them for reference</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacoby. Dave Jacoby.</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonshadrick.com/music-business/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacoby. Dave Jacoby.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonshadrick.com/2009/05/21/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Not Mark, but just saw it this morning.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is better than the current take Guitar Player 1.0, but....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I get why magazines, who spend so much time laying out and carefully placing ads and pictures and such, want to put their layout online. I was news-ed in college and copy editor for the student paper, and that can be tough.  But the web doesn&#039;t work like that. It&#039;s good that you can browse within, but say I said &quot;I know you&#039;re about to tour small clubs and know you don&#039;t want to take your sweet pre-war D28 on the road, but GP2 has reviews from some nice cheap dreads you wouldn&#039;t be crazy to take on tour&quot;, what link would I send? You can read Premier like a magazine with about the same tech, but you can also go back to standard linkable webpages, too. Which is good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Don&#039;t know if you have a sweet pre-war D28. If you do, I&#039;d be so jealous.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not Mark, but just saw it this morning.</p>
<p>It is better than the current take Guitar Player 1.0, but&#8230;.</p>
<p>I get why magazines, who spend so much time laying out and carefully placing ads and pictures and such, want to put their layout online. I was news-ed in college and copy editor for the student paper, and that can be tough.  But the web doesn&#39;t work like that. It&#39;s good that you can browse within, but say I said &#8220;I know you&#39;re about to tour small clubs and know you don&#39;t want to take your sweet pre-war D28 on the road, but GP2 has reviews from some nice cheap dreads you wouldn&#39;t be crazy to take on tour&#8221;, what link would I send? You can read Premier like a magazine with about the same tech, but you can also go back to standard linkable webpages, too. Which is good.</p>
<p>(Don&#39;t know if you have a sweet pre-war D28. If you do, I&#39;d be so jealous.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Shadrick</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonshadrick.com/music-business/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shadrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonshadrick.com/2009/05/21/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Mark, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What do you think about the new digital GP?  I haven&#039;t had a chance to really go through it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, </p>
<p>What do you think about the new digital GP?  I haven&#39;t had a chance to really go through it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Shadrick</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonshadrick.com/music-business/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shadrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonshadrick.com/2009/05/21/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>I do see the value in actually holding the magazine and reading it. I wonder if any of the magazines would publish an electronic version that could be read offline?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do see the value in actually holding the magazine and reading it. I wonder if any of the magazines would publish an electronic version that could be read offline?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Shadrick</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonshadrick.com/music-business/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shadrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonshadrick.com/2009/05/21/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>I was totally into Guitar for the Practicing Musician as well.  I loved the columns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was totally into Guitar for the Practicing Musician as well.  I loved the columns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Shadrick</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonshadrick.com/music-business/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shadrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 12:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonshadrick.com/2009/05/21/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Rebecca, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for participating and posting a link to the new issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebecca, </p>
<p>Thanks for participating and posting a link to the new issue.</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacoby. Dave Jacoby.</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonshadrick.com/music-business/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacoby. Dave Jacoby.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 11:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonshadrick.com/2009/05/21/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Not Mark, but just saw it this morning.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is better than the current take Guitar Player 1.0, but....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I get why magazines, who spend so much time laying out and carefully placing ads and pictures and such, want to put their layout online. I was news-ed in college and copy editor for the student paper, and that can be tough.  But the web doesn&#039;t work like that. It&#039;s good that you can browse within, but say I said &quot;I know you&#039;re about to tour small clubs and know you don&#039;t want to take your sweet pre-war D28 on the road, but GP2 has reviews from some nice cheap dreads you wouldn&#039;t be crazy to take on tour&quot;, what link would I send? You can read Premier like a magazine with about the same tech, but you can also go back to standard linkable webpages, too. Which is good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(Don&#039;t know if you have a sweet pre-war D28. If you do, I&#039;d be so jealous.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not Mark, but just saw it this morning.</p>
<p>It is better than the current take Guitar Player 1.0, but&#8230;.</p>
<p>I get why magazines, who spend so much time laying out and carefully placing ads and pictures and such, want to put their layout online. I was news-ed in college and copy editor for the student paper, and that can be tough.  But the web doesn&#39;t work like that. It&#39;s good that you can browse within, but say I said &#8220;I know you&#39;re about to tour small clubs and know you don&#39;t want to take your sweet pre-war D28 on the road, but GP2 has reviews from some nice cheap dreads you wouldn&#39;t be crazy to take on tour&#8221;, what link would I send? You can read Premier like a magazine with about the same tech, but you can also go back to standard linkable webpages, too. Which is good.</p>
<p>(Don&#39;t know if you have a sweet pre-war D28. If you do, I&#39;d be so jealous.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Shadrick</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonshadrick.com/music-business/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Shadrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 09:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonshadrick.com/2009/05/21/guitar-magazines-do-you-still-read-them/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Mark, &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What do you think about the new digital GP?  I haven&#039;t had a chance to really go through it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, </p>
<p>What do you think about the new digital GP?  I haven&#39;t had a chance to really go through it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
